The phrase signifies an error encountered inside the Conflict utility on the Android working system. Particularly, it denotes a failure to correctly save or persist the person’s configuration settings. This could manifest in numerous methods, corresponding to the appliance reverting to default settings upon restart, the lack to use newly configured guidelines, or normal instability within the utility’s habits associated to configuration administration. An occasion of this might be a person establishing customized proxy guidelines which can be then misplaced after closing and reopening the appliance, resulting in a lack of desired community configurations.
The decision of this difficulty is crucial for sustaining desired utility performance and person expertise. An incapacity to avoid wasting configurations can result in frustration, inefficient use of sources (requiring reconfiguration repeatedly), and probably compromised safety if desired proxy or filtering guidelines can’t be reliably utilized. Traditionally, all these configuration persistence errors can come up from points associated to file permissions on the Android system, bugs inside the utility’s code relating to file writing, or interference from different purposes impacting storage entry. Addressing these errors enhances utility stability and person belief.
Understanding the underlying causes and efficient troubleshooting steps is crucial to successfully resolve cases the place the appliance encounters this saving failure. Subsequent dialogue will give attention to figuring out potential causes, sensible diagnostic strategies, and customary options to rectify the error and guarantee correct utility configuration persistence.
1. Storage permission restrictions
Storage permission restrictions immediately impression the power of the Conflict utility on Android to persistently retailer its configuration settings. Inadequate or denied storage permissions stop the appliance from writing to the system’s storage, a mandatory course of for saving person preferences, guidelines, and different configurations. This restriction ceaselessly manifests as an error in the course of the configuration saving course of.
-
Android’s Permission Mannequin
Android working programs make use of a permission mannequin that requires purposes to explicitly request entry to system sources, together with storage. This mannequin prevents purposes from arbitrarily accessing delicate person information. If the appliance has not been granted the required permissions, makes an attempt to avoid wasting the configuration to storage will fail, resulting in the noticed error.
-
Affect on Configuration Information
The configuration settings for the appliance are usually saved in recordsdata positioned inside the utility’s designated storage space. Storage permission restrictions stop the appliance from creating, modifying, and even accessing these recordsdata. With out the power to put in writing to those configuration recordsdata, the appliance can not save any adjustments made by the person. This ends in the person’s settings being misplaced upon closing and reopening the appliance.
-
Person Revocation of Permissions
Even when the appliance initially had storage permissions, a person can revoke these permissions at any time by means of the Android settings. If the appliance makes an attempt to avoid wasting configuration information after the person has revoked storage entry, the saving course of will fail. The person will encounter the error and their settings is not going to be preserved. This could occur inadvertently after an OS replace adjustments permission defaults.
-
Scoped Storage Limitations
Newer variations of Android implement scoped storage, additional limiting entry to exterior storage. With scoped storage, an utility can solely immediately entry its personal devoted listing. Making an attempt to avoid wasting the configuration outdoors of this designated space, even when normal storage permission is granted, will nonetheless lead to a saving error. The appliance wants to stick to scoped storage tips.
In abstract, storage permission restrictions function a major reason for configuration saving failures inside the utility on Android. The Android permission mannequin, impacts on config recordsdata, person revocation of permissions, and scoped storage limitations work together to generate this difficulty, highlighting the significance of granting and sustaining mandatory storage permissions for the appliance to perform accurately and persistently save person configurations.
2. Configuration file corruption
Configuration file corruption stands as a major instigator of the error, whereby the Conflict utility fails to avoid wasting its settings on Android. Broken or incomplete configuration recordsdata impede the appliance’s capability to correctly load and save crucial parameters, resulting in a persistent save failure message.
-
Incomplete Writes Throughout Save Operations
An incomplete write operation, typically ensuing from sudden utility termination, energy loss, or system crashes, can depart the configuration file in a corrupted state. For instance, if the appliance is actively writing to its configuration file when the Android system unexpectedly shuts down, the write course of could also be interrupted halfway. The ensuing file will comprise solely a partial dataset, resulting in errors when the appliance makes an attempt to learn from or append to this corrupted file. This could manifest as lacking configurations, incorrect rule units, or normal instability. Subsequent makes an attempt to avoid wasting the configuration may also fail, perpetuating the error.
-
Disk Errors and Storage Media Points
Underlying storage media issues, corresponding to unhealthy sectors or file system errors, can induce configuration file corruption. If the bodily location on the system’s storage the place the configuration file resides turns into corrupted, the appliance can be unable to reliably learn from or write to that file. As an illustration, if a crucial portion of the file containing rule definitions is saved on a nasty sector, the appliance could not have the ability to parse these guidelines, leading to unpredictable habits or the configuration saving error. Checking storage well being can typically reveal the foundation trigger.
-
Software program Bugs and Coding Errors
Defects inside the utility’s codebase itself can contribute to configuration file corruption. Programming errors within the file dealing with logic, corresponding to incorrect file pointers or improper information serialization, may end up in the appliance writing invalid information to the configuration file. As an illustration, if the appliance incorrectly calculates the dimensions of an information construction earlier than writing it to the file, it could overwrite adjoining information, successfully corrupting the configuration. Such coding errors necessitate utility updates to rectify.
-
Exterior Interference from Third-Social gathering Purposes
Sure third-party purposes, corresponding to file managers or safety instruments, would possibly inadvertently corrupt the configuration file. Overly aggressive file cleansing processes, for instance, could determine the configuration file as pointless information and try to change or delete it, resulting in corruption. Equally, safety purposes using defective file integrity checks might flag official components of the configuration file as suspicious, leading to unintended modifications. Avoiding or fastidiously configuring such software program can mitigate this danger.
These sides collectively show that configuration file corruption can stem from various sources, starting from hardware-level points to software-related defects and exterior interferences. Every of those mechanisms can independently or collaboratively set off the configuration saving failure inside the utility. Addressing these points necessitates a multifaceted strategy, encompassing storage diagnostics, software program updates, and scrutiny of third-party utility habits, all geared in direction of preserving the integrity and accessibility of the appliance’s configuration recordsdata.
3. Inadequate space for storing
Inadequate space for storing on an Android system immediately contributes to the error, stopping the Conflict utility from efficiently saving its configuration. When the accessible storage is depleted or falls beneath a crucial threshold, the working system restricts file writing operations, together with these mandatory for saving utility settings. This constraint triggers the noticed configuration saving error, hindering correct utility performance.
-
File Creation and Modification Failure
The Conflict utility requires enough free area to create or modify configuration recordsdata. When storage is missing, the appliance’s try to put in writing configuration information ends in a failure. This could manifest as an incapacity to avoid wasting new guidelines, replace proxy settings, or persist any user-defined preferences. The appliance then presents the error, indicating that the saving operation couldn’t be accomplished because of storage limitations. For instance, a person would possibly alter their proxy settings, solely to have these settings revert to default upon restarting the appliance as a result of failed save operation.
-
Working System Useful resource Allocation
Android allocates space for storing for purposes to make the most of for numerous operations, together with information caching, non permanent recordsdata, and configuration storage. Inadequate storage can impression the working system’s capability to allocate the required sources to the appliance, leading to saving failures. This difficulty arises when the working system prioritizes important system features, probably depriving the appliance of the required space for storing to finish its duties. The configuration error turns into a consequence of this useful resource allocation battle.
-
Affect on Momentary Information and Cache
Earlier than saving the configuration file, the appliance could create non permanent recordsdata or make the most of a cache to stage the information. Restricted storage hinders the creation and administration of those intermediate recordsdata, resulting in issues in the course of the saving course of. If the appliance can not allocate the required area for these non permanent recordsdata, it can not correctly assemble and save the whole configuration. This could create a loop of failed saves as the appliance makes an attempt to put in writing the settings.
-
Configuration Backup and Restore Limitations
Some purposes assist configuration backup and restore functionalities, which require enough space for storing to retailer backup copies of the configuration. In eventualities the place storage is restricted, the appliance could fail to create backups or correctly restore earlier configurations. This exacerbates the difficulty, because the person can not revert to a working configuration if the present one is corrupted or misplaced. This performance is compromised when the system reviews no storage accessible.
The confluence of those components underscores the crucial position of accessible space for storing in stopping the error. The lack to create or modify recordsdata, limitations imposed by the working system’s useful resource allocation, challenges in managing non permanent recordsdata, and compromised backup functionalities coalesce to manifest because the configuration saving failure, underscoring the connection between accessible storage and dependable utility habits.
4. Utility code defects
Utility code defects symbolize a elementary supply of the “conflict for android “. Imperfections inside the utility’s programming logic can immediately impede its capability to precisely save configuration settings, ensuing within the manifestation of the error. Analyzing these defects is essential for understanding the underlying causes and implementing efficient options.
-
Improper File Dealing with Routines
Insufficient or misguided file dealing with routines inside the utility’s code can result in failures in the course of the configuration saving course of. For instance, if the appliance makes use of incorrect file pointers or fails to correctly shut a file after writing, the configuration file could develop into corrupted or incompletely saved. The result’s the “conflict for android ” showing upon subsequent utility restarts, as the unfinished or broken configuration file can’t be correctly loaded. This could additionally embrace race situations throughout concurrent learn/write operations resulting in corruption.
-
Incorrect Knowledge Serialization/Deserialization
The processes of knowledge serialization (changing information buildings right into a format appropriate for storage) and deserialization (reconstructing information buildings from saved information) are crucial for persisting configuration settings. Defects in these processes can result in information loss or corruption in the course of the save/load operations. As an illustration, if the appliance incorrectly serializes a fancy configuration object, crucial parameters could also be omitted or misrepresented when saved to the configuration file. Upon reloading, the appliance will fail to correctly reconstruct the configuration, triggering the “conflict for android ” and probably inflicting unpredictable utility habits. A selected case would possibly contain failure to deal with completely different information sorts correctly.
-
Reminiscence Administration Points
Faulty reminiscence administration practices inside the utility can not directly result in configuration saving failures. Reminiscence leaks, buffer overflows, or improper reminiscence allocation may cause the appliance to develop into unstable and probably crash in the course of the configuration saving course of. A crash throughout a save operation can depart the configuration file in an incomplete or inconsistent state, resulting in the “conflict for android “. Poorly managed reminiscence may also restrict the sources accessible to the appliance for writing to the config file. As an illustration, the system could terminate the appliance because of excessive reminiscence consumption, interrupting the saving course of and resulting in information loss.
-
Exception Dealing with Deficiencies
Inadequate or inappropriate exception dealing with can stop the appliance from gracefully recovering from errors encountered in the course of the saving course of. If the appliance encounters an sudden error (e.g., a file entry violation) and lacks correct exception dealing with, it could terminate abruptly, leaving the configuration file in an inconsistent state. Conversely, an exception will be improperly caught and suppressed. It is a downside as a result of the method could fail silently, leading to information loss. This silent failure will result in the conflict for android upon restart. Correct exception dealing with mechanisms would enable the appliance to log the error, probably recuperate, and stop the configuration saving failure, finally mitigating the incidence of the “conflict for android “.
These cases underscore the inherent hyperlink between utility code defects and the emergence of “conflict for android “. Correcting these programming imperfections necessitates rigorous code evaluate, complete testing, and adherence to safe coding practices to make sure the strong and dependable saving of configuration settings inside the utility, thus stopping the error and enhancing the general person expertise. Common software program updates are key to mitigating code defects.
5. Working system updates
Working system updates can immediately contribute to cases of the “conflict for android “. The introduction of recent safety protocols, altered file system permissions, or adjustments to the Android Storage Entry Framework inside an working system replace can disrupt the appliance’s capability to avoid wasting configuration information accurately. For instance, a current Android replace could implement stricter guidelines relating to file entry, thereby denying the appliance the required permissions to change its configuration recordsdata, even when such permissions had been beforehand granted. In such eventualities, the appliance fails to persist the person’s settings, resulting in the error.
Additional, working system updates can introduce unexpected compatibility points with present purposes. Updates could alter utility programming interfaces (APIs) that the Conflict utility depends upon for file dealing with or storage entry. If the appliance shouldn’t be designed to accommodate these adjustments, saving makes an attempt may end up in errors. Furthermore, updates can typically set off permission resets, successfully revoking the storage permissions that the appliance beforehand possessed, thereby hindering its capability to avoid wasting configurations. As an illustration, an replace would possibly mechanically disable “Enable storage entry” and require the person to manually re-enable it. This requires diligent developer consideration and subsequent app updates to deal with these cases.
In abstract, working system updates can inadvertently create an setting the place the appliance’s configuration saving mechanisms are compromised, resulting in the emergence of the “conflict for android “. Understanding the potential impression of working system adjustments on utility performance is crucial for each builders and customers. Utility builders ought to proactively check their software program towards beta variations of working system updates to determine and handle compatibility points. Customers ought to guarantee the appliance is up to date to the newest model to learn from bug fixes and compatibility enhancements, thereby minimizing the danger of encountering such errors.
6. Interfering purposes
Interfering purposes can not directly precipitate the “conflict for android “. The coexistence of purposes competing for system sources, significantly those who closely make the most of storage or manipulate file programs, can create situations that result in configuration saving failures. As an illustration, an excessively aggressive system optimization instrument would possibly prematurely terminate the appliance’s save course of, leading to an incomplete or corrupted configuration file. Equally, sure safety purposes, whereas intending to guard system integrity, could misidentify the configuration file as a possible risk and stop it from being written. The confluence of such interactions disrupts the traditional operation of the saving course of.
Contemplate a situation the place a file supervisor utility, configured to mechanically clear non permanent recordsdata, inadvertently deletes a brief configuration file that the Conflict utility is actively utilizing throughout its save operation. This sudden elimination of a crucial useful resource can result in the saving course of being interrupted mid-write. Additional, the concurrent operation of a number of purposes partaking in heavy I/O operations can result in disk competition, slowing down the save course of and rising the chance of knowledge corruption. An alternate interference situation might contain a background course of frequently monitoring file system adjustments, thus locking the config file, making it unimaginable to avoid wasting. Diagnosing this requires cautious monitoring of system exercise and figuring out purposes with extreme useful resource consumption or those who immediately work together with the appliance’s storage space.
In abstract, the connection between interfering purposes and the conflict for android stems from useful resource competition, file system manipulation, and safety interactions. Managing and controlling the purposes working concurrently on the Android system is paramount. Prioritizing important operations, avoiding overly aggressive optimization instruments, and thoroughly configuring safety purposes can reduce the potential for interference and mitigate the incidence of the configuration saving failure.
7. Incorrect file paths
Incorrect file paths symbolize a tangible supply of the configuration saving error inside the utility on Android units. When the appliance makes an attempt to avoid wasting or load its configuration file utilizing an incorrect path, the operation inevitably fails. This misdirection prevents the appliance from finding and writing to the supposed storage location, consequently resulting in the system displaying a saving error message. For instance, if the appliance is coded to retailer its configuration file in `/sdcard/conflict/config.yaml`, however a change inside the working system or the appliance itself alters this anticipated path, the appliance’s saving makes an attempt can be directed in direction of a non-existent or inaccessible location, ensuing within the error.
The importance of file paths inside utility performance can’t be overstated. They perform because the handle by which the appliance interfaces with the storage system. An incorrect file path could stem from numerous causes, together with misconfiguration, coding errors, or adjustments within the Android setting. Addressing the difficulty includes verifying that the appliance is utilizing the right and up-to-date file path, and that the desired path has the required permissions to permit the appliance to put in writing information. Using debugging instruments and file system inspection to substantiate the validity of the file path is paramount in figuring out and rectifying the configuration saving downside.
In abstract, incorrect file paths act as a crucial obstacle to the correct configuration saving course of, immediately contributing to the error. Understanding and verifying file paths are important steps in diagnosing and resolving saving points inside the utility. Correction necessitates confirming the appliance makes use of a sound, accessible, and permitted path that aligns with the Android setting, guaranteeing the dependable preservation of utility settings. Common testing, significantly after working system updates, may also be sure that file paths proceed to perform as supposed.
8. Improper shutdown course of
An improper shutdown strategy of an Android system throughout a save operation by the Conflict utility generally is a direct catalyst for the configuration saving error. When the system shouldn’t be shut down by means of the usual process, it could actually interrupt crucial write operations and result in configuration file corruption or incomplete saves, thereby ensuing within the configuration save failure message upon restart.
-
Interrupted File Write Operations
When an Android system is abruptly powered off or crashes in the course of the strategy of saving the Conflict utility’s configuration, the write operation to the configuration file is prematurely terminated. This ends in an incomplete file save, leaving the configuration file corrupted or lacking important information. Subsequent makes an attempt to load the configuration will fail, displaying the configuration save error. For instance, a person makes adjustments to their proxy settings inside the Conflict utility, after which powers off the system with out correctly exiting the appliance. The settings are seemingly misplaced or corrupted, as a result of interrupted write operation.
-
File System Inconsistencies
An improper shutdown can result in file system inconsistencies, the place metadata related to the configuration file turns into inaccurate or mismatched. The file system, accountable for organizing and monitoring recordsdata on the storage media, will be left in a unstable state throughout an abrupt termination. Such inconsistencies can stop the appliance from correctly accessing or modifying its configuration file. An working system could try to appropriate this on reboot; nonetheless, the harm to the file itself might be irreversible. This, once more, triggers the appliance saving error message.
-
Lack of Configuration Knowledge
Throughout a correct shutdown, purposes are given a chance to avoid wasting their state and clear up any non permanent recordsdata. Nonetheless, an improper shutdown bypasses this course of, rising the danger of shedding unsaved information. The Conflict utility’s configuration settings, if not dedicated to persistent storage previous to the shutdown, are merely misplaced. As an illustration, customized guidelines or proxy settings is probably not utilized after restarting the appliance, requiring the person to re-enter them. This underscores the significance of permitting the system to close down usually to stop lack of settings.
-
Elevated Threat of File Corruption
Abruptly terminating the system’s energy throughout lively file write operations heightens the chance of configuration file corruption. The configuration file is inclined to containing incomplete or inconsistent information, rendering it unusable by the appliance. This could require deleting and recreating the configuration file, which leads to the lack of settings and requires ranging from scratch. Knowledge corruption and loss is way increased when the configuration file is saved on flash storage, in comparison with onerous drives. This emphasizes the fragile nature of recordsdata and the significance of correct shutdown.
Finally, the correlation between an improper shutdown course of and the looks of the “conflict for android ” lies within the interruption and destabilization of file saving operations. The implications of such interruptions can vary from minor information loss to extreme file corruption, all of which consequence within the person encountering the saving error upon utility restart. Adhering to the usual shutdown process is crucial to minimizing the danger of those points and sustaining the integrity of the appliance’s configuration.
9. Inadequate reminiscence allocation
The manifestation of the “conflict for android ” will be immediately attributed to inadequate reminiscence allocation in the course of the configuration saving course of. When the Conflict utility makes an attempt to persist its settings, it requires a enough quantity of accessible RAM to quickly retailer the configuration information, carry out mandatory operations (corresponding to serialization or compression), and write the file to storage. If the system can not present the wanted reminiscence because of competing processes or general reminiscence limitations, the saving operation will fail. This failure then presents the person with the error message, indicating the lack to avoid wasting the present configuration. The scarcity of reminiscence restricts the appliance’s capability to perform as supposed and protect person settings, illustrating the crucial dependency of the appliance on enough reminiscence sources.
Inadequate reminiscence allocation can come up from a number of sources. A tool with restricted bodily RAM could battle to accommodate the appliance’s reminiscence requests, significantly when different memory-intensive duties are working concurrently. Background processes, corresponding to automated backups or system updates, can devour a good portion of accessible reminiscence, leaving inadequate sources for the Conflict utility to finish its saving operations. Inefficient reminiscence administration inside the utility itself might exacerbate the difficulty. For instance, the appliance could leak reminiscence over time, step by step lowering accessible sources till the saving course of is triggered, at which level the allocation fails. Addressing this downside typically includes terminating pointless purposes, rising swap area (if supported), or updating the appliance to a model with improved reminiscence administration. If issues persist, think about using a tool with elevated RAM.
In abstract, the “conflict for android ” is usually a direct consequence of inadequate reminiscence allocation, which limits the appliance’s capability to carry out configuration saving operations. Managing reminiscence utilization on the system, coupled with guaranteeing the appliance is up to date with improved reminiscence administration, is paramount in mitigating this difficulty. The issue highlights the necessity for a balanced strategy, optimizing system useful resource utilization to allow the appliance to perform accurately and reliably protect person configurations. Subsequently, customers ought to shut pointless apps and cut back background processes to assist Conflict to avoid wasting the config efficiently.
Incessantly Requested Questions
This part addresses frequent inquiries and misconceptions regarding the “conflict for android configuration saving error.” The purpose is to supply readability and sensible options to the persistent difficulty.
Query 1: What are essentially the most prevalent causes of the configuration saving error?
The configuration saving error usually arises from insufficient storage permissions, file corruption, inadequate space for storing, code defects inside the utility itself, working system replace incompatibilities, or interference from different working purposes.
Query 2: How can storage permission restrictions be addressed?
To grant enough storage permissions, the appliance must be accessed by means of the Android settings menu. Navigate to “Apps,” choose the Conflict utility, and be sure that storage permissions are enabled. Observe that permission standing could change after an working system replace.
Query 3: What steps will be taken to mitigate the danger of configuration file corruption?
To mitigate the danger of file corruption, persistently enable the appliance to correctly shut down, keep away from abrupt system termination, and guarantee enough space for storing. Common backups of the configuration file may also present a restoration level.
Query 4: How does inadequate space for storing contribute to this error, and the way can it’s resolved?
Inadequate space for storing prevents the appliance from writing the configuration file, triggering the error. Resolving this includes releasing up area by deleting pointless recordsdata, clearing caches, or shifting information to exterior storage.
Query 5: How do working system updates have an effect on the appliance’s capability to avoid wasting configurations?
Working system updates can alter storage permissions or introduce API adjustments. Customers are suggested to replace the appliance to the newest model following an working system replace to learn from compatibility fixes.
Query 6: How do interfering purposes contribute to the configuration saving error, and the way can their impression be minimized?
Interfering purposes, corresponding to aggressive system optimizers or safety instruments, could disrupt the saving course of. Reduce their impression by fastidiously configuring their habits or quickly disabling them to watch whether or not the difficulty resolves.
Addressing this configuration saving error requires a multifaceted strategy. Cautious consideration to storage permissions, file integrity, accessible area, utility updates, and potential conflicts with different purposes is paramount. Diagnosing and resolving these points enhances the general performance of the appliance.
The subsequent part offers strategies to correctly diagnose “conflict for android”.
Troubleshooting the Configuration Saving Error
The following pointers present a structured strategy to resolving the configuration saving error inside the Conflict utility on Android. Adhering to this course of can facilitate a extra environment friendly prognosis and answer.
Tip 1: Confirm Storage Permissions. Verify that the appliance has been granted the required storage permissions inside the Android settings. Navigate to the appliance settings and verify for storage entry rights. Re-grant permissions if mandatory.
Tip 2: Guarantee Ample Storage House. Verify the system’s accessible storage. Release area by deleting pointless recordsdata, clearing cached information, or shifting content material to exterior storage.
Tip 3: Overview Configuration File Integrity. Study the configuration file for corruption. If accessible, open the file and search for anomalies or inconsistencies. A identified good backup must be used to overwrite the prevailing file.
Tip 4: Replace the Utility. Verify for accessible updates for the appliance on the Google Play Retailer. Builders typically launch updates that handle bugs and enhance compatibility, together with these associated to file saving operations.
Tip 5: Determine Interfering Purposes. Quickly disable not too long ago put in purposes or these identified for aggressive useful resource administration, corresponding to battery savers or system optimizers, to evaluate whether or not they’re interfering with the configuration saving course of.
Tip 6: Verify File Paths. Confirm the configuration file paths inside the utility settings or configuration recordsdata. Guarantee they’re correct and accessible.
Tip 7: Carry out a Clear Restart. Absolutely shut the appliance and restart the Android system. This could clear non permanent recordsdata and resolve conflicts that could be hindering the saving course of.
Implementing these measures affords a scientific path to diagnosing and resolving the prevalent configuration saving error. These actions contribute to a steady, functioning utility expertise.
The next part presents the conclusion for this doc.
Conclusion
This doc has comprehensively explored the “conflict for android ” phenomenon, detailing its origins in components corresponding to storage permissions, file integrity, reminiscence allocation, and code integrity. It emphasizes the multifaceted nature of the issue and the need of a radical strategy to prognosis and determination. Addressing storage restrictions, verifying enough area, updating the appliance, and recognizing interfering purposes are essential steps in direction of mitigating this error.
Efficient administration and understanding of the interaction between the appliance, the working system, and exterior components are important for customers. The continued dedication to sustaining a steady setting, mixed with proactive troubleshooting, can considerably cut back cases of this particular difficulty and comparable configuration-related errors, guaranteeing a extra seamless person expertise. Customers ought to stay conscious of potential causes and implement preventative measures to guard towards the recurring failure of configurations.
